Processing of Vitamin B

Processing of Vitamin B | Before we see the process of vitamin B, lets see before this one about type of vitamin B.

In the process, or if it must go through the cooking process, should not be boiled. It is recommended to process using microwave or by steaming. This is because vitamin B is easily soluble in water and easily damaged if heated. Instead, store food sources of vitamin B in the cold in the fridge so that this vitamin is maintained.

Although the amount needed by the body is not too much, but the vitamin B that has the kind of diverse beneficial to the body, especially in helping the body get energy. By knowing the various types with different benefits, you can try to make the body's vitamin B remain unfulfilled.

Types of Vitamin B, Rich Benefits

Types of Vitamin B, Rich Benefits | You have probably heard of vitamin B. Of vitamin B is unique there are many types of B vitamins that are beneficial to the body. Vitamin B1, vitamin B2, vitamin B6 or vitamin B12 may be often heard. Actually, there are eight types of vitamin B which have different functions. What type of vitamin B? How much is needed? What are the benefits for the body? And what food sources that contain vitamin B type?

Types of Vitamin B

Vitamin B has 8 types, namely vitamin B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, and B12. This vitamin deficiency can cause various diseases. That's why there are many many multivitamin that includes vitamin B variations of several types of so-called vitamin B-complex. Here is an explanation of the types of vitamin B.

1. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine)
Function: Change the carbohydrates in foods into energy.
Needs: Women 1.1 mg 1.2 mg Men: Pregnant and nursing women 1.4 mg.
Sources: Rice, bread, cereals, flour, seafood such as shrimp, crab or shellfish.

2. Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin)
Function: Maintain healthy eyes and skin.
Needs: Women 1.1 mg; Men 1.3 mg 1.6 mg for lactating women.
Sources: Milk, cheese, chicken, broccoli, spinach, mushrooms.

3. Vitamin B3 (Niacin)
Function: For healthy skin, increase appetite, improve digestive system and help convert food into energy.
Needs: Women 14 mg, 16 mg Men: 18 mg Pregnant women: 17 mg for lactating women.
Sources: Grains, beans, beef, mushrooms.

4. Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid)
Function: Together with other types of vitamin B, vitamin B5 is useful in the breakdown of fats, proteins, carbohydrates into energy. Another benefit is for the formation of red blood cells and make vitamin D.
Needs: Women 4 mg; Men 6 mg, 5 mg Pregnant women: women breast-feeding 6 mg.
Sources: chicken, sardines, avocado, watermelon.

5. Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine)
Function: Required in the process of amino acids and fats.
Needs: Women 1.3 mg; Men 1.3 mg 1.9 mg Pregnant women: 2 mg for lactating women. Most of the consumption of vitamin B6 with the consumption of more than 50 mg per day can cause permanent nerve damage.
Sources: Meat, poultry, fish, beef, potatoes, tomatoes, bananas, fruit purple and green vegetables.

6. Vitamin B7 (Biotin)
Function: Helps in the breakdown of fats, proteins into energy that will be used by the body.
Needs: Women 25 meg; Male 30 meg; Pregnant women 30 meg; 35 meg breast-feeding women.
Sources: The flesh of the salmon, eggs, milk, cereal, bananas and peanuts.

7. Vitamin B9 (folate)
Function: Charge to the cells in the body develop properly, forming red blood cells and prevent nerve damage in the fetus.
Needs: Women's 400 meg; Men 400 meg; Pregnant women 600 meg; Lactating 500 meg. Excessive vitamin B12 will cause vitamin B12 deficiency.
Sources: Milk and dairy products, beets, liver, melons and green leafy vegetables.

8. Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin)
Function: Change the carbohydrates, proteins and fats into energy, maintain healthy red blood cells, protects nerve cells, preventing cardiovascular disease, and prevent brain shrinkage that can lead to memory decline.
Needs: Women's 2.4 meg; Men 2.4 meg; 2.6 meg pregnant women; women breastfeed 2.8 meg.
Sources: Beef, fish, liver, eggs, milk, soy and seaweed.

Vitamin B has many benefits. Especially for pregnant and lactating women, should always keep enough vitamin B are met in the daily diet. For all people, vitamin B strongly support the fulfillment of good nutrition.

See how process of vitamin B

What will high court do on health law? 4 most possible scenarios

Last week, U.S. Supreme Court justices heard arguments about the constitutionality of the federal health-care reform law. At the center of the debate is whether the government can force people to buy health insurance, a provision often referred to as the individual mandate. There are four likely scenarios that will be the outcome of the justices' decisions, asserts Jennifer Haberkorn for Politico, all of which come with their own problems.

Scenario 1: The individual mandate is struck down, as well as insurance reforms: If these parts of the Affordable Care Act are scrapped, "Insurance companies will still be able to deny coverage based on customers' costly pre-existing conditions and charge more to older and sicker — or female patients," Haberkorn reports.

If that happens, the Obama administration and Democrats would likely blame Republicans for promoting a lawsuit that puts insurance companies in charge again. If reaction from the public is strong, Republicans may feel obligated to enact insurance reforms without an individual mandate. Ideas for doing this include "charging more if a person buys insurance at the last minute, tax incentives and a promise that if a person buys coverage, that person wouldn't lose it if he or she were to get sick and need it," Haberkorn reports.

Scenario 2: The mandate is struck down, but insurance reforms stay intact: Part of the reason why insurance companies agreed to stop denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions is they could offset the losses because the law would enlarge their insurance pool by 30 million people — the number of Americans who lack coverage.

If insurance companies are still required to stop denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions but the individual mandate is struck down "They could start a mini revolt over having to cover expensive patients without the mandate," Haberkorn reports.

Scenario 3: The entire law, or the majority of it, is axed: That would mean unpopular parts of the law would be trashed, but so would popular ones, including the pre-existing conditions piece as well as a provision that allows young adults to stay on their parents' health insurance until the age of 26.

In 2010, 26 provisions took effect and another 17 did last year. Nine new provisions are taking place this year. "Lawmakers designed the phase-in, in part, with the thought that the public would become more supportive of the law once certain provisions began to take hold," report Michael Doyle and David Lightman for McClatchy Newspapers.

Scrapping the law entirely could cause the most political fallout. "Republicans would try to move quickly to enact a small-scale health reform legislation aimed at restoring some of the popular pieces of the health law," Haberkorn reports. "But Democrats won't want to support something far less comprehensive than the Affordable Care Act, not with some 50 million Americans uninsured."

Scenario 4: The law stands: Though this is the hope of the Obama administration, "The mandate is considered relatively weak: The penalty for not obeying it starts at $95 in 2014 — that's nothing compared with the cost of insurance premiums," Haberkorn reports. The amount increases to $695 by 2016.

As for what the justices will do, "at least some of the court's conservatives seem prepared to kill the whole bill," report Doyle and Lightman. "My approach would be, if you take the heart out of the statue, the statute is gone," Justice Antonin Scalia said.

Justice Elena Kagan countered, "Half a loaf is better than no loaf," while Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suggested, "It's a question between a wrecking operation and a salvage job."

Some justices said the whole bill should be sacked, "on the theory that members of Congress would not have voted for it without the mandate," Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times. But Justice Sonia Sotomayor said killing the whole law "would be too broad an assertion of judicial power," Liptak notes. Justice Anthony Kennedy, the likely swing vote, said "We would be exercising the judicial power, if one provision was stricken and the others remained, to impose a risk on insurance companies that Congress had never intended."

The justices probably decided the future of the law Friday morning, reports Mark Sherman for The Associated Press. Typically, an initial vote is "followed soon after by the assignment of a single justice to write a majority opinion, or in a case this complex, perhaps two or more justices to tackle different issues. That's where the hard work begins, with the clock ticking toward the end of the court's work in early summer," Sherman writes.

In Kentucky, health advocates and officials are watching closely to see what happens. "I think the entire health-care sector and insurance sector are watching this closely because it has significant implications on both industries," said Stephen Williams, chief executive officer of Norton Healthcare. "This is very far-reaching."

In Kentucky, the law extends coverage for 35,000 young adults, reports Laura Ungar for The Courier-Journal. (Read more)

2012 county health rankings released; meant to spur local change

By Tara Kaprowy

Kentucky Health News

Meant to be a conversation starter to fuel change for better health, the third-annual County Health Rankings were released today, a health-evaluation tool that assesses the country's counties on everything from their smoking to early mortality rates. Kentucky's rankings did not change significantly from last year, with Oldham and Boone counties at the top and Owsley, Magoffin and Wolfe counties at the bottom of the list.

Kentuckians who are the least healthy live in the Appalachian swath of the state, the rankings show. Fulton County in Kentucky's southwestern tip ranks low, though is not surrounded by other low-ranked areas. Counties that hug urban centers — Louisville, Lexington and Cincinnati — have the highest rankings. The data are compiled by the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute in collaboration with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Kentucky's breakdown is not unusual, but part of a nationwide pattern in which the least healthy counties are often in rural, sparsely populated areas, said Dr. Patrick Remington, lead researcher and associate dean for public health at UW's School of Medicine and Public Health. "At the other end, you see urban centers as having similar problems and often ranking at the bottom of the list," he said. "Another pattern is some of the suburban communities, ring communities, are some of the healthiest communities."

Counties are ranked in two ways: health outcomes (such as premature death rates, low birthweight, how good or bad people feel physically and mentally) and health factors (such as smoking, obesity and binge-drinking rates). In health outcomes, graphic above, Oldham, Boone and Calloway ranked first, second and third respectively. Owsley County was ranked last, preceded by Martin and Wolfe counties.

In health factors, left, Woodford County ranked first, followed by Oldham and Boone. Clay County (labeled CY) was in last place, preceded by Magoffin and Wolfe counties (MG and WO).

Though Kentucky's counties are ranked from 1 to 120, because of the small sample sizes in many of them, the rankings do not "represent statistically significant differences from county to county," the rankings website reads. Sources for the data also change, so direct comparisons from year to year are also inexact, Remington said. This year, researchers tracked the number of fast-food restaurants in a county and levels of physical inactivity. They also used premature death rate trends over 10 years, a hard number that alone can indicate progress, Remington said.

Though Remington said he would "be naive to say the competitive element doesn't pique interest in the rankings," they are "not really intended to be a race to the top." Instead, rankings should be used as a "Polaroid snapshot of community health," Remington said. The data should be used by officials to pinpoint problem areas, drill down and make policy changes in turn, he said.

That's what Chip Johnson, mayor of Hernando, Miss., did. Participating in a teleconference about the rankings, Johnson talked about how policies aimed at improving health have changed his city. Officials have required sidewalks in all new and re-developments, he said. All new streets should be biking and pedestrian accessible. The city has partnered with schools so people can use their gyms to work out. And Johnson encouraged a local bank to donate land for a 37-acre park. "Banks are sitting on land they've repossessed and don't know what to do with it," he said. "We're naming the park after the bank."

The goal is to create infrastructure that will make it easier for people to make healthy decisions, he said, pointing out, "You can't exercise your personal responsible for good health if your city or county does not give you that atmosphere or opportunity." Johnson said he responded to this reality by strategically placing the city's only farmers' market, community garden and community center in its lowest-income area.

As indicated by the data assessed and Johnson's efforts, "Much of what influences our health happens outside of the doctor's office," foundation President Risa Lavizzo-Mourey said, and factors like education rates, income levels and access to healthy food all play a part, researchers found. Data also show where someone lives can influence health. Excessive drinking, for example, is highest in Northern states. Rates of teen births, sexually transmitted infections and children living in poverty are highest in Southern states.

The rankings are based on several sources of data, from vital statistics to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the world's largest, on-going telephone health survey. "We found even though the data are available nationally, it requires a lot of time and effort," Remington said. "This is one-stop shopping, not just for death and disease rates but for all of the factors that lead to a healthy community. Combining them allows people to start the conversation pretty easily."

Susan Zepeda, CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, applauded the effort. "Local health data can spur communities to action to create better health outcomes for all Kentuckians," she said.

This week is National Public Health Week; this year's focus is on prevention and wellness

With a focus on prevention and wellness this year, the Kentucky Department of Public Health is promoting national Public Health Week, which kicked off yesterday and will be observed until Sunday. The prevention theme was chosen to underscore the impact of chronic disease on the American population.

Americans miss 2.5 billion days of work because of diseases like heart disease, cancer and diabetes, which costs the country $1 trillion. Unintentional injuries, such as those stemming from motor vehicle accidents, poisonings and burns, rank within the top 10 causes of death for people 44 and younger, according to a DPH press release.

"Often, these horrible diseases and injuries could have been prevented with more attention to lifestyle choices like physical activity and nutrition or preventive safety measures," said Dr. Steve Davis, acting DPH commissioner. "The health care community — as well as the individual — must work to understand the risk for developing chronic disease and avoiding injury so that we can prevent complications. This is key to improving the health of our state."

Public health is also crucial in emergency response, as witnessed with recent tornadoes that struck the state. "The contribution of public health is tremendous — both on a day-to-day basis and in times of crisis," Davis said. "I encourage everyone to go online to read more about our public health programs; talk to your health care provider about chronic disease and injury prevention; or, better yet, visit your local health department to learn more about how public health can — and does — improve your life." (Read more)

'One Text or Call Could Wreck It All' traffic safety campaign being promoted this month

A new traffic campaign with the slogan of "One Text or Call Could Wreck It All" is being sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration this month.

April has been designated Distract Driving Awareness Month, with Kentucky law-enforcement agencies committed to spreading the word. In 2009, nearly 5,500 people were killed and another half a million people were hurt in accidents caused by distracted driving, according to national safety administration figures.

The national effort "focuses on ways to change the behavior of drivers through legislation, enforcement, public awareness and education — the same activities that have curbed drunken driving and increased seat belt use," The Courier-Journal reports.

Officials said they want to reach teen drivers especially with the effort, since that group has the highest proportion of distracted drivers who were involved in fatal crashes. (Read more)

Bill amendment could make dental, vision care more expensive

A last-minute amendment to a bill intended to limit when insurance companies could terminate policies may end up costing Kentuckians more out-of-pocket dental and vision expenses, Courier-Journal political writer Joseph Gerth writes in his weekly column.

The implications of House Bill 497 changed when Sen. Tom Buford, R-Nicholasville, "filed a one-paragraph amendment that was brought to him at the last minute by a lobbyist for the Kentucky Dental Association," Gerth writes. "That amendment said that if you have vision or vision insurance, your insurance provider can't require your health care provider to give you discounted rates on services that aren't paid for by the insurance plan."

That could mean that low-cost plans that only cover a few procedures but offer "added benefit by making sure you're not paying inflated prices for other services" may no longer be available, Gerth reports. Opponents say insurance companies will stop offering such plans because people won't buy them without the discounts. And people who can't afford more expensive plans will sacrifice dental and vision insurance.

On Tuesday, the Senate adopted the amendment and passed the bill. The bill cleared the House the next day. Gov. Steve Beshear has not indicated if he will sign or veto it.

Advocates say the bill will save in dental and vision care costs. Opponents say people will have difficulty having access to case. As for who's right, Gerth writes: "Bill advocates have presented no evidence to suggest that, and there have been no full-fledged hearings for the dentists behind the bill to make their case or to answer the questions that need to be asked." (Read more)